#77761: "Tournament Points Option 1 for Winner and 0 for Everyone Else"

• Falls du eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Bildschirm siehst, bitte kopieren und einfügen.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Bitte erkläre, was du machen wolltest, was du dann getan hast und was dann passiert ist
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• Bitte kopiere den Text, der in Englisch anstatt in deiner Sprache angezeigt wird, und füge ihn hier ein. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Ist dieser Text auf der Übersetzungsseite verfügbar? Wenn ja, wurde dieser vor mehr als 24 Stunden übersetzt?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• Was wurde auf dem Bildschirm angezeigt, als du blockiert wurdest (weißer Bildschirm? Teil der Spieloberfläche? Fehlermeldung?)
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• Welcher Teil der Spielregel wurde durch die BGA-Adaption nicht beachtet?
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Ist der Regelverstoß in der Spielwiederholung zu sehen? Falls ja, bei welcher Zugnummer?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• Welche Spielaktion wolltest du durchführen?
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Was versuchst du, um diese Spielaktion auszulösen?
• Was passiert, wenn du dies versuchst (Fehlermeldung, Statusmeldung des Spiels, ...)?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• An welcher Stelle im Spiel ist das Problem aufgetreten? Was war die aktuelle Spielanweisung?
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Was passiert, wenn du die Spielaktion ausführen möchtest (Fehlermeldung, Statusmeldung des Spiels, ...)?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• Bitte beschreibe die Anzeigeschwierigkeiten. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• Bitte kopiere den Text, der in Englisch anstatt in deiner Sprache angezeigt wird, und füge ihn hier ein. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Ist dieser Text auf der Übersetzungsseite verfügbar? Wenn ja, wurde dieser vor mehr als 24 Stunden übersetzt?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...

I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...

Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.

That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.

Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v108

Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?

Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus

Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus

Bitte überprüfe, ob bereits eine Meldung zum gleichen Thema existiert

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Meldungshistorie

Ergänze diese Meldung

Ändere den Status der Meldung auf:

Hilfe

Leiste einen Beitrag

Folge uns