Alle Meldungen
Burgle Bros. Meldungen
#70514: "Modify the allocation of ELO points according to difficulty"
awaiting: Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: meiner Meinung nach würde das Folgende die Umsetzung des Spiels erheblich verbessern
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
In my opinion, as in all cooperatives, successful matches should be rewarded with a higher allocation of ELO points.
Especially if matches are played at a higher difficulty.
In fact, it is very disappointing to see a +1 attributed to one's points after even an hour of play.
Let's try to give the player a little more respect and gratification, please.• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v104
Meldungshistorie
23. Aug 2022 10:34 •
Romain672 • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
28. Aug 2022 18:34 • Here is what I would propose:
Base: +4 elo
Characters: no change
Level:
Hard: x2 elo
Normal: x1 elo
Easy: x0 elo
Scenario:
Bank job: x1 elo
Office job: x0.75 elo
Fort Knox job: x0.75 elo
Walls: no change (potentially a bonus of x1.25 if you choose random wall and don't reroll the walls)
Multi-characters: no change
Deadbolt: no change
If elo given is 0, increase it to 1.
Base: +4 elo
Characters: no change
Level:
Hard: x2 elo
Normal: x1 elo
Easy: x0 elo
Scenario:
Bank job: x1 elo
Office job: x0.75 elo
Fort Knox job: x0.75 elo
Walls: no change (potentially a bonus of x1.25 if you choose random wall and don't reroll the walls)
Multi-characters: no change
Deadbolt: no change
If elo given is 0, increase it to 1.
Romain672 • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
28. Aug 2022 18:36 • Oh I forget the number of players. Regicide do that.
Since the time of the game kinda multiply by the number of players, let's do a big change:
1 player: x1.25 elo
2 players: x1 elo
3 players: x2 elo
4 players: x3 elo
Since the time of the game kinda multiply by the number of players, let's do a big change:
1 player: x1.25 elo
2 players: x1 elo
3 players: x2 elo
4 players: x3 elo
nccc • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
9. Sep 2022 1:40 •
18. Sep 2022 16:56 • elo is useless in coop games.
jknitnerd • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
26. Okt 2022 5:27 • I agree in that there should be some ELO point difference awarded when playing at Easy, Normal, or Difficult, perhaps a system like what Tranquility uses would be useful to model (another co-op with multiple difficulty settings)
niraD • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
11. Mär 2023 0:35 • Also, other coop games give you more ELO points depending on how well the team did. For example, in Just One everyone can score between 4 and 13 ELO points, based on the number of points the team finished with (4 means you barely won, and 13 is a perfect game). Or in None Shall Pass, you score based on how many monsters you defeated (1 means you beat the final monster but let the other 4 through, and 5 means you beat them all).
So maybe the ELO points for Burgle Bros could be based on how many Stealth Tokens you had left at the end, how many unused Tools you had left at the end, how fast all the guards are moving at the end, or some combination.
For example, if all the guards are moving at 6, then you clearly took your time. But each guard moving slower than that indicates that you spent less time on that level. And if you finish with 6 unused Tools, then clearly you ransacked the place (3 safes, 2 laboratories, plus an extra one from either The Rigger or the Jury-rig event) without using the tools you found. And obviously, if you finish with your Stealth Tokens intact, you did a better job than if you finished by the skin of your teeth with no Stealth Tokens left.
So maybe the ELO points for Burgle Bros could be based on how many Stealth Tokens you had left at the end, how many unused Tools you had left at the end, how fast all the guards are moving at the end, or some combination.
For example, if all the guards are moving at 6, then you clearly took your time. But each guard moving slower than that indicates that you spent less time on that level. And if you finish with 6 unused Tools, then clearly you ransacked the place (3 safes, 2 laboratories, plus an extra one from either The Rigger or the Jury-rig event) without using the tools you found. And obviously, if you finish with your Stealth Tokens intact, you did a better job than if you finished by the skin of your teeth with no Stealth Tokens left.
RockinRye • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
12. Mai 2023 22:16 • I totally agree. When you're playing with more difficult settings (including random characters, more players, random walls, fewer starting stealth tokens..) you should definitely get more than +1 ELO.
BronzeKnight • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
30. Jul 2023 21:33 • I have the game at home, and according to the rulebook, Fort Knox is considered the "hard" settings, not Bank Job.
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine andere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.