Alle Meldungen
Sankt Petersburg Meldungen
#47769: "no need to be sorted when cards flip."
inforequest: Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: meiner Meinung nach würde das Folgende die Umsetzung des Spiels erheblich verbessern
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
when cards appear, cards are sorted.
but, I want to know who caused to flip 18 aristocrat on aristocrat phase.
I suggest not to be sorted when cards flip.• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v92
Meldungshistorie
4. Sep 2021 12:06 • Faceman255 • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
It makes the game more interesting.
4. Sep 2021 18:38 • Inaofr • Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag:
So you want drawn cards to be placed on the board in the order they were drawn?
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
14. Sep 2021 15:29 • debjwillis • Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag:
I agree. I often wonder what the order is of the cards that come up in the next phase so I can better determine the effects of previous actions. Perhaps there's a way to first show the order that the cards came up in when beginning the new phase, and then provide a button where the player could autosort the cards by value when they are ready to do so?
27. Sep 2021 10:13 • Faceman255 • Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag:
Yes, I think cards should be placed on the board in the order they were drawn.
1. Jun 2022 4:07 • Faceman255 • Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag:
In this game, mistress on the 1st round is very important.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
1. Jun 2022 4:15 • Faceman255 • Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag:
the reason why take meaningless card to flip more UG cards, to flip UG arist.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
1. Jun 2022 4:34 • Faceman255 • Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag:
it is a problem that we can't know the information that we can know at the real game.
7. Jun 2024 13:57 • bananasplay • Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag:
As debjwillis writes, one benefit of knowing the order of cards drawn is to ascertain the effects of previous actions. If one, for example, purchases or reserves a card in a given phase, one more card is drawn in the next phase—/which/ card, however, remains a mystery in the current implementation because the cards are automatically sorted. But if the cards were instead shown in the order drawn, the "extra" card would be obvious.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
14. Jun 2024 18:43 • TaxMan5x • Die Entwickler hätten gern mehr Informationen zu diesem Vorschlag:
It's an interesting suggestion, but it reminds me of "chasing the rabbit" in hold em poker. While it's interesting to see if your choice was the correct one, it won't (or shouldn't) change your mind about that prior choice. Beyond self-validation, it doesn't really add anything to the game or your strategy.
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
