Alle Meldungen
BANG! Meldungen
#45389: "Change recommend player count to 7"
awaiting: Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: meiner Meinung nach würde das Folgende die Umsetzung des Spiels erheblich verbessern
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
Change recommend player count to 7• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v14.1
Meldungshistorie
23. Jul 2021 19:16 • gghaveanicedayseeya • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
It looks more 'dynamic' for seven players, and perhaps more fun for renegade too.
In bgg voting 7player (67% voted) is much more suggested than 5 (only 30%).
If the suggested setting is switch to 7, it is easier to play in 7, since currently simply mode players would automatically make a 5p table (they would follow suggested player count), They would take away people once it reaches 5, and make it harder to wait for 7people.
Thanks for helping.
I also propose changing suggested player count of Skull, from 3 to 6. It's me in that report too! :D
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=39056
In bgg voting 7player (67% voted) is much more suggested than 5 (only 30%).
If the suggested setting is switch to 7, it is easier to play in 7, since currently simply mode players would automatically make a 5p table (they would follow suggested player count), They would take away people once it reaches 5, and make it harder to wait for 7people.
Thanks for helping.
I also propose changing suggested player count of Skull, from 3 to 6. It's me in that report too! :D
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=39056
23. Jul 2021 19:24 • gghaveanicedayseeya • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
And distance matters much more in 7p too!
26. Jul 2021 18:56 • gghaveanicedayseeya • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
now I am not sure
in 5p it is quite difficult not for the sheriff team to win (assume they are experienced), unless people can find and kill the vice first, but it's hard. And for situation when a full hp sheriff, a vice and another guy left, it's almost a guarantee win (a vice should agree not to play a miss / beer, and let his hp drop to 1, with the other player. if the other player do not agree, he is discovered. if he agrees, he lost when 1v1 to sheriff).
in 7p adding 1 outlaws and 1 vice is too beneficial to the sheriff side (there are double amount of vice, but only 50% increase in size for outlaws).
I haven't tried 6, hope it would be better!
I also find the game unexpectably slow, often has 15-20 minutes to play, just to see who has better cards and win once all roles become clear. decision making does not matter that much, and the social deduction part doesn't affect much in the game.
in 5p it is quite difficult not for the sheriff team to win (assume they are experienced), unless people can find and kill the vice first, but it's hard. And for situation when a full hp sheriff, a vice and another guy left, it's almost a guarantee win (a vice should agree not to play a miss / beer, and let his hp drop to 1, with the other player. if the other player do not agree, he is discovered. if he agrees, he lost when 1v1 to sheriff).
in 7p adding 1 outlaws and 1 vice is too beneficial to the sheriff side (there are double amount of vice, but only 50% increase in size for outlaws).
I haven't tried 6, hope it would be better!
I also find the game unexpectably slow, often has 15-20 minutes to play, just to see who has better cards and win once all roles become clear. decision making does not matter that much, and the social deduction part doesn't affect much in the game.
9. Aug 2021 16:54 • voriki • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
"in 7p adding 1 outlaws and 1 vice is too beneficial to the sheriff side (there are double amount of vice, but only 50% increase in size for outlaws)."
But your forget the Renegade, the first half of the game, he acts as a Vice(Deputy) too.
But your forget the Renegade, the first half of the game, he acts as a Vice(Deputy) too.
26. Okt 2022 11:36 • spressi • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
"in 7p adding 1 outlaws and 1 vice is too beneficial to the sheriff side (there are double amount of vice, but only 50% increase in size for outlaws)"
Adding 1 outlaw and 1 vice is actually beneficial for the outlaws. You always have the Sheriff buffed (+1 life, first move of the game) and Renegade swinging for balance but slightly in favor for law (since Sheriff must survive). So let's say these elements add .5 to the law side. Then, in 5p, it is 2 vs 2.5 and in 7p it is 3 vs 3.5. The marginal benefit is thus smaller (but still existent) for the law in a 7p game.
Adding 1 outlaw and 1 vice is actually beneficial for the outlaws. You always have the Sheriff buffed (+1 life, first move of the game) and Renegade swinging for balance but slightly in favor for law (since Sheriff must survive). So let's say these elements add .5 to the law side. Then, in 5p, it is 2 vs 2.5 and in 7p it is 3 vs 3.5. The marginal benefit is thus smaller (but still existent) for the law in a 7p game.
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
