Alle Meldungen
Khronos Meldungen
#9130: "When I created a Junction between domains, the interface forced me to downsize buildings in a loop"
fixed: Der Fehler wurde behoben
8
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Regeln: Eine Regel des Spiels wurde nicht beachtet
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Welcher Teil der Spielregel wurde durch die BGA-Adaption nicht beachtet?
Junction• Ist der Regelverstoß in der Spielwiederholung zu sehen? Falls ja, bei welcher Zugnummer?
don't know move number• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome
Meldungshistorie
10. Feb 2018 1:30 • Victoria_La • Die Entwickler brauchen mehr Informationen, um den Fehler nachzuvollziehen:
If I don't know the move number I don't know what was the situation, also downsizing in a loop is possible
if your buildings will in violation of rule of hierarchy, so what rule was violated?
if your buildings will in violation of rule of hierarchy, so what rule was violated?
10. Feb 2018 1:39 • Victoria_La • Der Fehler wurde von den Entwicklern bestätigt:
If you taking about move 21, the downsizing was triggered 2nd time in Age of Faith, unfortunately
game allow allowed to select building which was not scheduled to be selected for downsizing
Contender for dominion most prestigious building - Chapel #10 power 1 owned by sataryuya
Contender for dominion most prestigious building - Chapel #12 power 1 owned by sataryuya
Conflict of hierarchy detected
jdgreenbaum removed 'Chapel #11' at Age of Might (3,6)
jdgreenbaum picked building to downsize 'Chapel #11' at Age of Might (3,6)
At that moment you suppose to select building 10 and 12 and that was highlighted and some how
you managed to select a diffrent building from wrong age
game allow allowed to select building which was not scheduled to be selected for downsizing
Contender for dominion most prestigious building - Chapel #10 power 1 owned by sataryuya
Contender for dominion most prestigious building - Chapel #12 power 1 owned by sataryuya
Conflict of hierarchy detected
jdgreenbaum removed 'Chapel #11' at Age of Might (3,6)
jdgreenbaum picked building to downsize 'Chapel #11' at Age of Might (3,6)
At that moment you suppose to select building 10 and 12 and that was highlighted and some how
you managed to select a diffrent building from wrong age
11. Feb 2018 17:36 • Hairry • Der Fehler wurde von den Entwicklern bestätigt:
At table #37602800, starting with move #25:
- Red constructs 'Hamlet #11' at Age of Might (10,4), which connects 4 dominions
- Conflict of hierarchy detected: red's Chapel #1, blue's Chapel #10 and Chapel #11
- According to rules, red's own Chapel #1 is downsized and removed automatically by the game
- Conflict of hierarchy still persists between blue's Chapel #10 and Chapel #11
- At this point, as no own buildings are involved, Red needs to choose the building to downsize
- Contrary to the rules, Red is able to choose ANY building on the map, not just the 2 involved in the conflict
- Red selects to downsize:
- 'Keep #13' at Age of Might (11,6)
- 'Watchtower #1' at Age of Might (12,5)
- 'Chapel #13' at Age of Might (5,10)
- 'Watchtower #11' at Age of Faith (5,10)
- and finally 'Chapel #10' at Age of Might (10,3)
Players must be limited to choose only buildings involved in the conflict.
- Red constructs 'Hamlet #11' at Age of Might (10,4), which connects 4 dominions
- Conflict of hierarchy detected: red's Chapel #1, blue's Chapel #10 and Chapel #11
- According to rules, red's own Chapel #1 is downsized and removed automatically by the game
- Conflict of hierarchy still persists between blue's Chapel #10 and Chapel #11
- At this point, as no own buildings are involved, Red needs to choose the building to downsize
- Contrary to the rules, Red is able to choose ANY building on the map, not just the 2 involved in the conflict
- Red selects to downsize:
- 'Keep #13' at Age of Might (11,6)
- 'Watchtower #1' at Age of Might (12,5)
- 'Chapel #13' at Age of Might (5,10)
- 'Watchtower #11' at Age of Faith (5,10)
- and finally 'Chapel #10' at Age of Might (10,3)
Players must be limited to choose only buildings involved in the conflict.
13. Feb 2018 1:09 • Victoria_La • Der Fehler wurde behoben:
Yeah it was pretty bad as it allows cheating and removing an arbitrary building, fixed now
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
