Alle Meldungen
Turncoats Meldungen
#79384: "tie game should be a loss for all, but someone won"
fixed: Der Fehler wurde behoben
1
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Regeln: Eine Regel des Spiels wurde nicht beachtet
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Welcher Teil der Spielregel wurde durch die BGA-Adaption nicht beachtet?
tie game should be a loss for all, but someone won• Ist der Regelverstoß in der Spielwiederholung zu sehen? Falls ja, bei welcher Zugnummer?
end of game• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v109
Meldungshistorie
19. Jan 2023 11:05 • MathieuV • Das ist kein Fehler:
Hey !
Thanks for your feedback. I'm pretty sure it's a misunderstanding; please let me know how it could be clearer.
At the end of the game, we see which faction wins then which player wins.
The winning faction is:
- the one with the greatest value on the crown track (~ number of controlled regions)
- in case of a tie, the one with the greatest vale on the axe track (~ number of battle actions taken during the game)
- in case of a tie, the one with the greatest vale on the flag track (~ number of march actions taken during the game)
There can be perfect ties; in which case "no faction wins".
The winning player is:
- the one with the most tokens in hand of the winning faction
- in case of a tie, the one with the least tokens in hand of losing factions
- in case of a tie, the earlier one in turn order
There cannot be perfect ties between players.
To be honest, I'm not perfectly sure about the last tie breaker between players.
I thought it was "the first player who started negotiations that ended the game" but after discussing with the designer it seems much simpler; the initial turn order breaks ties (kinda make sense; sucks to play first in an area control game).
Best Regards,
Mathieu
Thanks for your feedback. I'm pretty sure it's a misunderstanding; please let me know how it could be clearer.
At the end of the game, we see which faction wins then which player wins.
The winning faction is:
- the one with the greatest value on the crown track (~ number of controlled regions)
- in case of a tie, the one with the greatest vale on the axe track (~ number of battle actions taken during the game)
- in case of a tie, the one with the greatest vale on the flag track (~ number of march actions taken during the game)
There can be perfect ties; in which case "no faction wins".
The winning player is:
- the one with the most tokens in hand of the winning faction
- in case of a tie, the one with the least tokens in hand of losing factions
- in case of a tie, the earlier one in turn order
There cannot be perfect ties between players.
To be honest, I'm not perfectly sure about the last tie breaker between players.
I thought it was "the first player who started negotiations that ended the game" but after discussing with the designer it seems much simpler; the initial turn order breaks ties (kinda make sense; sucks to play first in an area control game).
Best Regards,
Mathieu
26. Jan 2023 14:24 • MathieuV • Der Fehler wurde behoben:
Hey,
After further discussion with the designer, I got the last tie breaker for players wrong. It shall be ok now though.
Best Regards,
Mathieu
After further discussion with the designer, I got the last tie breaker for players wrong. It shall be ok now though.
Best Regards,
Mathieu
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
