Alle Meldungen
Just One Meldungen
#67657: "Collective Voting"
acknowledged: Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: meiner Meinung nach würde das Folgende die Umsetzung des Spiels erheblich verbessern
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
Have everyone vote to cancel a word and go with majority. This way if someone misses a match or was unsure, it would be caught by the table.• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v103
Meldungshistorie
10. Jul 2022 0:33 • CaptainTenille • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
not a bug, just a suggestion
10. Jul 2022 1:00 • KuWizard • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
That's how it was implemented as a first draft. People from publishing company (Repos Production) played with 7 players and decided that it kills the game pace and slows down it a lot. So they asked to do the next player verification only. Pretty sure they won't decide to change back
10. Jul 2022 1:24 • CaptainTenille • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
so it's better to have duplicate clues got through?
10. Jul 2022 6:51 • Pompkin • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
for live games it is easily fixed with a countdown timer of something like 10-15 seconds for all the cluegivers when the words are presented. If nobody clicks the duplicate/invalid clue button in that time game just progress as normal. It will both speed up the average waiting time for approving clues and increase the likelihood of catching errors.
10. Jul 2022 9:00 • KuWizard • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
Ok, timer could save the situation, I'll try to present this idea if more people vote for this one (it's just 1 vote at the moment)
10. Jul 2022 14:14 • CaptainTenille • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
Since it already has been implemented before, can't it just be an option when setting up the game? If the players want it, they just check the box and get the experience that they want.
11. Jul 2022 16:09 • Pompkin • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
another problem with letting just 1 player approve of the clues is that they are very likely to improve one of their own clues that break the rules as they wouldnt give that rule breaking clue in the first place if they know the rules.
11. Jul 2022 16:10 • Pompkin • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
improve=approve
28. Jul 2022 2:16 • FT3 • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
I came here to make the same report, the countdown timer for everyone sounds like a very neat solution to the problem.
11. Sep 2022 10:42 • OutOfHabit • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
I would love to see this change implemented, at least as an option .
Maybe an ability to mark a word as Wrong (X) or as Question (?) (and the rest are ok to keep)
Question lets the group know you want opinions about a word
Wrong (X) means you think it should go
Anyone can choose to just abstain from joining that part of they want,
And probably still on one person to submit it each time, rotating as it does now
Maybe an ability to mark a word as Wrong (X) or as Question (?) (and the rest are ok to keep)
Question lets the group know you want opinions about a word
Wrong (X) means you think it should go
Anyone can choose to just abstain from joining that part of they want,
And probably still on one person to submit it each time, rotating as it does now
26. Okt 2022 14:27 • Livini • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
#311910257
A player cancelled a perfectly valid clue (Shrek) and didn't cancel two identical clues with different (British/American) spelling (Grey and Gray). Mistakes like this could have been avoided if we'd voted collectively.
A countdown timer would be great so it doesn't slow down the pacing!
A player cancelled a perfectly valid clue (Shrek) and didn't cancel two identical clues with different (British/American) spelling (Grey and Gray). Mistakes like this could have been avoided if we'd voted collectively.
A countdown timer would be great so it doesn't slow down the pacing!
2. Nov 2022 9:13 • MIB5799 • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
Possible option: Have only 3 players do approval instead of all 6. Still much much better than only one.
Or even just 2 (with rotating tiebreaker like in Similo).
Or even just 2 (with rotating tiebreaker like in Similo).
14. Dez 2022 17:45 • bananasplay • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
Make this a table option when creating a game so that players can decide for themselves:
Next player's choice
Collective voting
Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).
Next player's choice
Collective voting
Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).
7. Mär 2024 17:13 • TheInquisitor • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
> Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).
This option would be a great help for friends who are just playing the infinite game amongst themselves.
This option would be a great help for friends who are just playing the infinite game amongst themselves.
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
