Alle Meldungen
Space Base Meldungen
#63467: "Random Number generator"
rejected: Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist
6
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: meiner Meinung nach würde das Folgende die Umsetzung des Spiels erheblich verbessern
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
The random number generator for this game does not seem to work properly. If you roll 2d6 (two normal dice), the probabilities for each number are weighted most toward the middle numbers, six(13.89%), seven (16.67%), and eight (13.89%). This means that 44.45% of the time, the dice should equal one of those three numbers. After more than 80 plays of this game, I can tell you that there is no way those percentages are holding up. What appears to be happening is an even chance (9.09%) of rolling each number from 2 through 12, rather than the proper spread we should be seeing. The end result is an overwhelming amount of rolls away from what should be the most commonly rolled numbers.• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v100
Meldungshistorie
25. Apr 2022 4:10 • Talon378 • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
This is occurring in every game I play of this game. The lack of compliance to what should be the proper probabilities for the spread of rolls means that the strategy of the game is altered and becomes MUCH more random.
6. Mai 2022 7:05 • Rick_M • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
I also sense that the dice rolls are not random. We just played 4 games and (1)(2) roll was much too frequent. I remember the first time I played and rolled 4 elevens in a row to start the game. I'd run some stats on the dice, but capturing the data from a game would be much too tedious.
Also, we had the same 4 players and selected replay option. The game displays message saying that player order is randomized, but we were in same order each game.
Also, we had the same 4 players and selected replay option. The game displays message saying that player order is randomized, but we were in same order each game.
9. Mai 2022 2:01 • Talon378 • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
Table #265890439
I had purchased sectors and set my board up to give me victory points any time I rolled a 7 or above. I rolled victory points once, and has to spend a cube to move to victory points a second time. It is ridiculous that in 50+ turns I could not roll a 7 or above. Fix your dice roller!
I had purchased sectors and set my board up to give me victory points any time I rolled a 7 or above. I rolled victory points once, and has to spend a cube to move to victory points a second time. It is ridiculous that in 50+ turns I could not roll a 7 or above. Fix your dice roller!
21. Jun 2022 20:06 • Biking Gamer • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
I concur - the dice rolls on this game (and others) does not appear random. I recommend using the milliseconds on clock time as a seed for your random number generator -- that should produce more random results.
10. Feb 2023 16:29 • Andrew C-137 • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
@ Rick_M
A simple solution for tracking dice throws is already there. All that needs to change with the stats at the end is to breakout a second column so that you can see the occurrences of single die results, then the second column shows "Two-Die" results. Right now having them combined is meaningless, but to see those separately, along with a total column at the end, will give you easily scrapeable data. One game of course won't be enough (anyone who's played roulette and seen a run of 50 reds knows what I'm talking about), and you'll have to extrapolate for 1's and 12 over 2 and 6's, but seeing that data over dozens of games might help people see if it's truly close to random.
A simple solution for tracking dice throws is already there. All that needs to change with the stats at the end is to breakout a second column so that you can see the occurrences of single die results, then the second column shows "Two-Die" results. Right now having them combined is meaningless, but to see those separately, along with a total column at the end, will give you easily scrapeable data. One game of course won't be enough (anyone who's played roulette and seen a run of 50 reds knows what I'm talking about), and you'll have to extrapolate for 1's and 12 over 2 and 6's, but seeing that data over dozens of games might help people see if it's truly close to random.
12. Feb 2023 16:18 • Shazzypaz • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
Developers are instructed to use the bga_rand() function, no flexibility to use another function. If you are concerned about the randomness, please upvote boardgamearena.com/bug?id=72077.
7. Apr 2023 1:40 • Antstad • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
Just upvoted. I sware it's getting worse on the site.
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
