#59714: "Allow players to indicate preference on being cluegiver or not"
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Bitte überprüfe, ob bereits eine Meldung zum gleichen Thema existiert
Wenn ja, STIMME bitte für diese Meldung. Meldungen mit mehr Stimmen erhalten höhere PRIORITÄT!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaillierte Beschreibung
-
• Falls du eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Bildschirm siehst, bitte kopieren und einfügen.
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. -
• Bitte erkläre, was du machen wolltest, was du dann getan hast und was dann passiert ist
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• Bitte kopiere den Text, der in Englisch anstatt in deiner Sprache angezeigt wird, und füge ihn hier ein. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. -
• Ist dieser Text auf der Übersetzungsseite verfügbar? Wenn ja, wurde dieser vor mehr als 24 Stunden übersetzt?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. • Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• Was wurde auf dem Bildschirm angezeigt, als du blockiert wurdest (weißer Bildschirm? Teil der Spieloberfläche? Fehlermeldung?)
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. • Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• Welcher Teil der Spielregel wurde durch die BGA-Adaption nicht beachtet?
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. -
• Ist der Regelverstoß in der Spielwiederholung zu sehen? Falls ja, bei welcher Zugnummer?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• Welche Spielaktion wolltest du durchführen?
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. -
• Was versuchst du, um diese Spielaktion auszulösen?
-
• Was passiert, wenn du dies versuchst (Fehlermeldung, Statusmeldung des Spiels, ...)?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• An welcher Stelle im Spiel ist das Problem aufgetreten? Was war die aktuelle Spielanweisung?
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. -
• Was passiert, wenn du die Spielaktion ausführen möchtest (Fehlermeldung, Statusmeldung des Spiels, ...)?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• Bitte beschreibe die Anzeigeschwierigkeiten. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. • Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• Bitte kopiere den Text, der in Englisch anstatt in deiner Sprache angezeigt wird, und füge ihn hier ein. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. -
• Ist dieser Text auf der Übersetzungsseite verfügbar? Wenn ja, wurde dieser vor mehr als 24 Stunden übersetzt?
• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
-
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.
I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:
1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)
2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)
3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes. • Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v15.2
Meldungshistorie
Ergänze diese Meldung
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
