• Falls du eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Bildschirm siehst, bitte kopieren und einfügen.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Bitte erkläre, was du machen wolltest, was du dann getan hast und was dann passiert ist

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte kopiere den Text, der in Englisch anstatt in deiner Sprache angezeigt wird, und füge ihn hier ein. Wenn du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (empfohlene Vorgehensweise), kannst du einen Bild‑Hosting‑Dienst deiner Wahl verwenden (snipboard.io zum Beispiel), um ihn hochzuladen und den Link hier einzufügen. Ist dieser Text auf der Übersetzungsseite verfügbar? Wenn ja, wurde dieser vor mehr als 24 Stunden übersetzt?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Was wurde auf dem Bildschirm angezeigt, als du blockiert wurdest (weißer Bildschirm? Teil der Spieloberfläche? Fehlermeldung?)

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Welcher Teil der Spielregel wurde durch die BGA-Adaption nicht beachtet?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Ist der Regelverstoß in der Spielwiederholung zu sehen? Falls ja, bei welcher Zugnummer?

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Welche Spielaktion wolltest du durchführen?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Was versuchst du, um diese Spielaktion auszulösen?

• Was passiert, wenn du dies versuchst (Fehlermeldung, Statusmeldung des Spiels, ...)?

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• An welcher Stelle im Spiel ist das Problem aufgetreten? Was war die aktuelle Spielanweisung?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Was passiert, wenn du die Spielaktion ausführen möchtest (Fehlermeldung, Statusmeldung des Spiels, ...)?

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte beschreibe die Anzeigeschwierigkeiten. Wenn du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (empfohlene Vorgehensweise), kannst du einen Bild‑Hosting‑Dienst deiner Wahl verwenden (snipboard.io zum Beispiel), um ihn hochzuladen und den Link hier einzufügen.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte kopiere den Text, der in Englisch anstatt in deiner Sprache angezeigt wird, und füge ihn hier ein. Wenn du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (empfohlene Vorgehensweise), kannst du einen Bild‑Hosting‑Dienst deiner Wahl verwenden (snipboard.io zum Beispiel), um ihn hochzuladen und den Link hier einzufügen. Ist dieser Text auf der Übersetzungsseite verfügbar? Wenn ja, wurde dieser vor mehr als 24 Stunden übersetzt?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?