Alle Meldungen
#49340: "Tournament creates too many tables with minimum player count"
implemented: Dieser Vorschlag wurde umgesetzt
1
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
BGA-Webseite
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: Meiner Meinung nach würde dadurch die Webseite deutlich verbessert
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
When creating a tournament for a multiplayer game, you can specify two quantities: the Number of Players in a Match and the Number of Players in a Match (minimum). When the tournament starts, it should create tables so that all players are playing (if possible) and most of the tables have the desired player count, not the minimum player count. Yet in many tournaments, I have seen that the algorithm creates far too many tables with the minimum (undesired) player count. A detailed example is below.• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Mozilla v5
Meldungshistorie
27. Sep 2021 16:59 • blockmonoid • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
An example tournament: boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=89107
There were 81 players. The Number of Players in a Match was 4, the minimum was 3. So the optimal configuration would be:
18 four-player tables and 3 three-player tables (81= 4*18+3*3)
Instead, the first round of the tournament had:
9 four-player tables and 15 three-player tables (81= 4*9+3*15)
I don't even know how the algorithm decided on this configuration, since it shows no preference between 4- and 3-player tables. But the result was that an extra 36=3*12 players were playing at 3-player tables in the tournament, when they could have been at 4-player tables. For a game like For Sale, that's a big difference, since 4-player is a good player count, but 3-player is quite bad.
There were 81 players. The Number of Players in a Match was 4, the minimum was 3. So the optimal configuration would be:
18 four-player tables and 3 three-player tables (81= 4*18+3*3)
Instead, the first round of the tournament had:
9 four-player tables and 15 three-player tables (81= 4*9+3*15)
I don't even know how the algorithm decided on this configuration, since it shows no preference between 4- and 3-player tables. But the result was that an extra 36=3*12 players were playing at 3-player tables in the tournament, when they could have been at 4-player tables. For a game like For Sale, that's a big difference, since 4-player is a good player count, but 3-player is quite bad.
31. Jan 2023 11:16 • Archduke • Dieser Vorschlag wurde umgesetzt:
Implemented (release notes: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=133530#p133530)
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
