Alle Meldungen
Präsident Meldungen
#20261: "Play order rule is not implemented in this version of the game"
rejected: Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist
17
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: meiner Meinung nach würde das Folgende die Umsetzung des Spiels erheblich verbessern
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
An important rule that isn't present yet in this alpha version is the order to play after role distribution. That is an important part of the rules to give an advantage to players who give high cards to the winners. Players start the new round according to the order of "leaving the game" from the previous round, starting with the last person with the cards on hand. First to play is beggar, then peasant, then citizen(s) (respecting the order if more than one), then prime minister and for last the president. It is very important for many reasons. Who give high cards (beggar and peasant) are the first to get rid of the lower ones too (at the start of the game) and if the president still has a strong hand, when he finishes his hand the beggar is the first to play after the president is out, giving another advantage so the game is more balanced. Without this mechanic game is just unbalanced.• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Google Chrome v83
Meldungshistorie
OmegaK • Der Fehler wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht nachvollzogen:
5. Jul 2020 4:54 •
20. Jul 2020 22:34 • It's a rule that I saw being referenced in many rule summaries and it's an important part of the games I played in real life.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_(card_game)
"Often, players move seats to sit in the order of their place, so as not to forget the order."
www.pagat.com/climbing/president.html
"For the next hand the players move seats. The President selects the most comfortable chair, the Vice President sits to the President's left, and so on around to the Asshole who sits to the President's right, probably on a crate or packing case."
www.britannica.com/topic/president-card-game
"also change their relative seating positions from deal to deal in accordance with their respective roles."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_(card_game)
"Often, players move seats to sit in the order of their place, so as not to forget the order."
www.pagat.com/climbing/president.html
"For the next hand the players move seats. The President selects the most comfortable chair, the Vice President sits to the President's left, and so on around to the Asshole who sits to the President's right, probably on a crate or packing case."
www.britannica.com/topic/president-card-game
"also change their relative seating positions from deal to deal in accordance with their respective roles."
quaresma95 • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
20. Jul 2020 22:34 • Hi, i never played the game like that but it could be a nice variation. I will to implement that variation when i have more time.
OmegaK • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
23. Jul 2020 13:19 • I didn't know in which category put this suggestion because I never saw anyone play without this rule. But if people play without it, it can be just an option in the future. Thank you for your work.
oceanwaves • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
20. Sep 2020 5:49 • I agree with this. right now the beggar gets to start the next round, the 1st + 2nd place players both get better cards, and the peasant is pretty much left hanging w/o the turn advantage and also robbed of best cards. lots of games take place where simply having to wait until 1st / 2nd place players get done playing the round so the best cards are out of the way before beginning to play cards as peasant.
deBoerisTroef • Die Entwickler stimmen zu, dass es eine gute Idee ist und werden daran arbeiten:
14. Jan 2021 11:02 • I disagree with the suggested rule (it's part of the fun, plus adds a strategy aspect: it's sometimes a good idea to let yourself demote to Beggar from the Peasant location.
Also, I can't see myself play this game with changing seats all the time. What a hassle...
Having said that - making it an option sounds like a good idea if people like it.
Also, I can't see myself play this game with changing seats all the time. What a hassle...
Having said that - making it an option sounds like a good idea if people like it.
ufm • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
3. Nov 2023 20:29 • I agree changing player order each time is too much hassle.
So, implemented the alternative first player rule/downfall/reversing 9 variant instead.
So, implemented the alternative first player rule/downfall/reversing 9 variant instead.
hyramgraff • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
24. Feb 2024 1:23 • I understand that this would be difficult to implement, but I consider this to be one of the core rules of the game and was surprised that does not happen by default.
ufm • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
24. Feb 2024 5:14 • President is not the Great Dalmuti which clearly states the seat order is the rank order.
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.