Alle Meldungen
#19843: "Either disable "conceed" option OR allow to end the game after conceeding"
awaiting: Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
BGA-Webseite
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: Meiner Meinung nach würde dadurch die Webseite deutlich verbessert
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
As a Seasons player, I find VERY frustrating when an opponent conceed the game near the end. When we work hard on a draft and cannot play it, it removes all the fun of the game. To me, it's actually highly unfair-play to do that.
To fix this frustration, I see 2 options:
- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Not relevant
Meldungshistorie
26. Jun 2020 16:35 • compte obelète • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
30. Jun 2020 13:52 • Niluje • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
My last 40 Seasons game: 7 conceed: 86%, 60%, 97%, 86%, 77%, 100%, 97%
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
2. Dez 2020 18:55 • Wicksweff • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
When you agree to a game, you should be agreeing to play it to completion.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
3. Dez 2020 1:16 • jda • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
I agree the current system is frustrating. Changing it to offer to concede would be good.
22. Mär 2021 12:06 • Maeves • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
i agree, you are thinking of your next move, and without notice, the game end because of conceed.
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
24. Mär 2021 19:14 • KongKing123 • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
No thanks. Forcing someone to play out a lost game just for your enjoyment is not the way to go.
27. Nov 2022 13:46 • Wicksweff • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
If you agree to the game, you play to the end.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
27. Nov 2022 15:58 • ufm • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
Qutting is equivalent to flipping the board. Not conceding.
27. Nov 2022 16:05 • ufm • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
Conceding literally means 'admitting their defeat', not flipping the board or ragequitting. The game has ended.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
20. Dez 2023 2:05 • Cos- • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
I strongly favor the last option: Allow remaining player to finish the game if someone concedes.
3. Feb 2024 9:29 • pecan • Dieser Vorschlag wurde von den Entwicklern noch nicht untersucht:
For me, we have option to resign is the biggest advantage of 2-player game.
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.
