Alle Meldungen
FlipToons Meldungen
#176171: "Assign position by final score"
rejected: Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist
1
Worum geht es bei dieser Meldung?
Was ist passiert? Bitte wähle unten aus
Vorschlag: meiner Meinung nach würde das Folgende die Umsetzung des Spiels erheblich verbessern
Detaillierte Beschreibung
• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.
Instead of giving a tie to all players who didnt have the single highest score, the final points for each player should be used to assign 2nd, 3rd, 4th. The whole goal of the game is to score the most points on the last round so this is more consistent with the normal bga way of assigning player position• Welchen Browser benutzt du?
Safari v18.5
Meldungshistorie
14. Jul 2025 15:02 •
jordijansen • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
14. Jul 2025 15:23 • I understand your suggestion but this was done for a very specific reason. Imagine a 3 player game and the final flip happens as followed:
Player 1: 32
Player 2: 32
Player 3: 30
Player 1 and player 2 are tied and need to reflip, this results in the following:
Player 1: 33
Player 2: 29
The final result is:
1st. Player 1
2nd. Player 2
3rd. Player 3
Using your method, the scoring would end up like this:
1st. Player 1
2nd. Player 3
3rd. Player 2
The score represents the number of final flip rounds needed, the tie breaker represents your final fame.
"Instead of giving a tie to all players who didnt have the single highest score" this is incorrect, as the actual fame is saved in the tiebreaker field. So the rank is determined correctly.
While this is a limitation of the framework, this was done deliberately.
Player 1: 32
Player 2: 32
Player 3: 30
Player 1 and player 2 are tied and need to reflip, this results in the following:
Player 1: 33
Player 2: 29
The final result is:
1st. Player 1
2nd. Player 2
3rd. Player 3
Using your method, the scoring would end up like this:
1st. Player 1
2nd. Player 3
3rd. Player 2
The score represents the number of final flip rounds needed, the tie breaker represents your final fame.
"Instead of giving a tie to all players who didnt have the single highest score" this is incorrect, as the actual fame is saved in the tiebreaker field. So the rank is determined correctly.
While this is a limitation of the framework, this was done deliberately.
Lawton • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
14. Jul 2025 17:41 • Hi, the way you are describing it totally makes sense to me but it doesn't match what im seeing in the results.
boardgamearena.com/table?table=698384230
Here, the final scores are 35, 29, 25, 24 with no reflip. The player with 35 won, but the other 3 players tied. Shouldn't the other 3 players be awarded 2nd, 3rd, and 4th based on their final score?
Maybe that means that the final scores look like
0 (35 tiebreak)
0 (29 tiebreak)
0 (25 tiebreak)
0 (24 tiebreak)
I agree that would be ugly but i know you have to work within the limits of bga
boardgamearena.com/table?table=698384230
Here, the final scores are 35, 29, 25, 24 with no reflip. The player with 35 won, but the other 3 players tied. Shouldn't the other 3 players be awarded 2nd, 3rd, and 4th based on their final score?
Maybe that means that the final scores look like
0 (35 tiebreak)
0 (29 tiebreak)
0 (25 tiebreak)
0 (24 tiebreak)
I agree that would be ugly but i know you have to work within the limits of bga
jordijansen • Die Entwickler denken, dass es keine gute Idee ist, oder dass das Verhältnis von Aufwand zu Nutzen zu hoch ist:
16. Jul 2025 9:50 • I think they are awarded 2nd, 3rd and 4th based on this result: boardgamearena.com/table?table=698384230
You can see all players were assigned a rank, or am I misunderstanding you?
You can see all players were assigned a rank, or am I misunderstanding you?
Ergänze diese Meldung
Bitte erwähne hier alles, was bedeutsam sein könnte, um diesen Fehler nachzuvollziehen oder deinen Vorschlag zu verstehen:
- Eine weitere Tisch-ID/Zug-ID
- Konnte F5 das Problem lösen?
- Trat das Problem öfter auf? Jedes Mal? Zufällig?
- Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.