• Falls du eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Bildschirm siehst, bitte kopieren und einfügen.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Bitte erkläre, was du machen wolltest, was du dann getan hast und was dann passiert ist

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte kopiere den Text, der in Englisch anstatt in deiner Sprache angezeigt wird, und füge ihn hier ein. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Ist dieser Text auf der Übersetzungsseite verfügbar? Wenn ja, wurde dieser vor mehr als 24 Stunden übersetzt?

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Was wurde auf dem Bildschirm angezeigt, als du blockiert wurdest (weißer Bildschirm? Teil der Spieloberfläche? Fehlermeldung?)

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Welcher Teil der Spielregel wurde durch die BGA-Adaption nicht beachtet?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Ist der Regelverstoß in der Spielwiederholung zu sehen? Falls ja, bei welcher Zugnummer?

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Welche Spielaktion wolltest du durchführen?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Was versuchst du, um diese Spielaktion auszulösen?

• Was passiert, wenn du dies versuchst (Fehlermeldung, Statusmeldung des Spiels, ...)?

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• An welcher Stelle im Spiel ist das Problem aufgetreten? Was war die aktuelle Spielanweisung?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Was passiert, wenn du die Spielaktion ausführen möchtest (Fehlermeldung, Statusmeldung des Spiels, ...)?

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte beschreibe die Anzeigeschwierigkeiten. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte kopiere den Text, der in Englisch anstatt in deiner Sprache angezeigt wird, und füge ihn hier ein. Falls du einen Screenshot dieses Fehlers hast (optimale Vorgehensweise), kannst du ihn bei Imgur.com hochladen, den Link kopieren und hier einfügen.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Ist dieser Text auf der Übersetzungsseite verfügbar? Wenn ja, wurde dieser vor mehr als 24 Stunden übersetzt?

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?

• Bitte erkläre deinen Vorschlag so präzise und genau wie möglich, damit er leicht zu verstehen ist.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Welchen Browser benutzt du?